|
Post by breckjensen on Dec 5, 2017 0:09:14 GMT -5
Hello, I'm new to IP and trying to understand software patents... As I understand, "software per se" is not patentable (i.e. a claim literally saying "A method implemented in software, comprising...") But as soon as someone says "A method implemented on a computer readable medium, comprising steps of..." is this ok? I've also seen the word "non-transitory" thrown in there as if it's some magic phrase, what does this mean? I've also heard about Bilski and Alice as being landmark cases regarding software... but I don't really 100% understand what their resulting consequences were. I guess what I'm trying to figure out is, is software suddenly patentable when it's claimed as a CRM containing instructions? What's this "non-transitory" phrase? Is it only OK when the software is just a step of a larger process actually involving hardware? How has Alice affected all of this? Please Help. Thanks ! I didn't find the right solution from the internet. References: www.intelproplaw.com/ip_forum/index.php/topic,26979.0.html 3D Promotional Videos
|
|